I know. I know. It just isn’t fair!
Well, that’s right … It isn’t.
We would like to think that everything is good. And barring that, at least “I am good.” With the not often missing complement, … “and therefore, if you are not like me, you are bad.”
See, in law there are always
In yesterday’s post, I reviewed the case Lilly v. Lynch, 88 Wn.App. 306 (Div. II 1997). For those not wishing to review, it was basically about Ms. Lilly going beyond what seems to have been a longstanding boundary wall which was used to recognize her boundary from a chain of previous neighbors. She
Big game next Sunday. For those folks who will be out on the gridiron, for what is likely the majority of their lives, they have likely been asked: How Bad Do You Want It?
It’s quite likely that many of them want it pretty-darn bad. So much so that if it were legal to
If you have a boundary issue with your neighbor, you probably are not in such good cheer.
Well, now is the time to do something about it. Justice Smiles has refined its process to further assist you. This is how it lays out.
Ever noticed that writers and contributors to The Economist are not provided a byline. Generally, this is a bad sign. As I recall from anEdward Tuftee presentation, every document should have the author’s name on it. This provides accountability. Yet, as lawyers know, for every rule – there is an exception. The Economist is that exception!
“Wars of Reasonableness” – as defined here at Justice Smiles – are generally conducted by providing choice:
Justice
Estoppel in Pais literally means “by act of notoriety” of something which is “solemnly acknowledged.” Right. So, yet again we are going to delve into what is noticed on the ground. Here are its elements – ehr “requirements”:
Almost coincident with this Smart Money article by Quentin Fottrell in which I am quoted: “Try to build a good relationship with your neighbors because friends usually don’t sue friends,” I got myself involved in quite a rumpus with my friend and neighbor. This was my error!
Without going into particulars, I wrongly felt that I was
Whether directly expressed or not, my boundary dispute clients often ask: “Why is my neighbor doing this to me?” The answer to this seemingly simple question lies in the fact that someone believes that they have a superior position.
Notably, superior position does not necessarily mean superior rights. No, no, no, no. Superior position is
Bud, I like you. Just remember this:
Man looks into the abyss.
There is nothing staring back at him.
At that moment, man gains his character.
And that … is what keeps him out of the abyss.
That’s the language that I recall a seasoned, senior broker, played by Hal Holbrook, used to
